MB Financial Bank NA v. T-L Conyers, LLC

(N.D. Ind. Feb. 4, 2015)

In this consolidated appeal of four single asset real estate chapter 11 cases, the district court affirms the bankruptcy court’s denial of the secured creditor’s motion for stay relief. The debtors had proposed plans that consolidated claims against the separate debtors into a single class of claims. The bankruptcy court held the plans were unconfirmable with such a provision, although it was an issue of first impression. The debtor then appealed, proposed new plans without the consolidation provision, then dismissed the appeal. The creditor sought stay relief under § 362(d)(3), arguing that the debtor had not proposed a plan with a reasonable possibility of being confirmed within the timeframe of § 362(d)(3). The court holds that the debtor satisfied the requirements and stay relief was appropriately denied. The first proposed plan had a reasonable possibility of being confirmed following appeal, and the debtors’ decision to file new plans outside the timeframe actually expedited the reorganization process. Opinion below.

2015-02-04 – mb financial bank v t-l conyers llc

Author: Matt Lindblom

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s