FTI Consulting, Inc. v. Merit Management Group, LP

(7th Cir. July 28, 2016)

The Seventh Circuit holds that the safe harbor provision of 11 U.S.C. § 546(e) does not apply to a transaction in which an entity that serves as merely a conduit for a pre-petition transfer is the only entity that fits one of the necessary categories of entities in that section. The conduit was a financial institution, which is a type of entity protected by § 546(e). However, neither the debtor nor the transferree were a type of entity that is protected. Thus, the court holds that the safe harbor provision does not apply and reverses the district court judgment. Opinion below.

Judge: Wood

Attorneys for Trustee: Reid Collins & Tsai LLP, Gregory S. Schwegmann

Attorneys for Defendant: Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Jason J. DeJonker, James B. Sowka

2016-07-28 – fti consulting v merit management

Author: Matt Lindblom

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s