In re Ramey

(6th Cir. B.A.P. Sep. 30, 2016)

The Sixth Circuit B.A.P. affirms the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing the Chapter 7 case for failure to complete the 11 U.S.C § 109(h) pre-petition credit counseling. The debtor argued the requirement should be waived in this case for reasons including that the §109(h)(2) and (3) exceptions should apply. The bankruptcy court held the exceptions did not apply. The debtor could not establish incapacity, because the debtor was able to complete the counseling post-petition, and the debtor failed to establish that the debtor could not obtain pre-petition counseling within seven days of a request or any other exigent circumstances. Opinion below.

Judge: Humphrey

Debtor: pro se

Author: Matt Lindblom

2016-09-30-in-re-ramey

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s