In re Smith

(Bankr. S.D. Ind. Oct. 6, 2016)

The bankruptcy court sustains the trustee’s objection to confirmation of the debtor’s chapter 13 plan. The proposed plan provided for monthly payments for three years, but the Court finds that the applicable commitment period should be five years. The debtor argued that he should have a “marital adjustment” for loan payments on which his wife is contractually obligated, but the Court holds that those payments should be included in the calculation of the debtor’s combined monthly income, and thus the applicable commitment period is five years. Opinion below.

Judge: Carr

Attorney for Debtor: John Steinkamp & Associates, John T. Steinkamp

Trustee: Ann M. DeLaney

2016-10-06-in-re-smith

Author: Matt Lindblom

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s