Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc.

(U.S. Sup. Ct. Feb. 27, 2018)

The Supreme Court holds that the safe harbor of 11 U.S.C. § 546(e) applies only to the transfer that is sought to be avoided, and is not applicable based solely on intermediary transfers. Section 546(e) exempts from a trustee’s avoidance powers certain types of transfers (e.g., settlement payments as defined in § 101) to certain protected parties, including financial institutions. If the transfer sought to be avoided is between two non-protected parties, the safe harbor does not apply, even if there is an intermediary or conduit party that is a protected party. Opinion below.

Justice: Sotomayor

2018-02-27 – merit management v. fti consulting

Author: Matt Lindblom

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s